|
|
- SEMANTIC KNIGHT: Just a flesh wound. [kick]
- HACKER: Look, stop that.
- SEMANTIC KNIGHT: You won't be able to get
machine-machine services without an ontology to formally describe all
the relationships! [kick]
- HACKER: Right!
[whop] [HACKER chops the SEMANTIC KNIGHT's third argument off by building
SOAPy and RESTful services with only implicit semantic descriptions]
- SEMANTIC KNIGHT: Right. I'll do you for that!
- HACKER: You'll what?
- SEMANTIC KNIGHT: Come here!
- HACKER: What are you going to do, bleed on me?
- SEMANTIC KNIGHT: I'm invincible!
- HACKER: You're a looney.
|
|
|